Catalogo Articoli (Spogli Riviste)

OPAC HELP

Titolo:
The optimal form of urinary drainage after acute retention of urine
Autore:
Patel, MI; Watts, W; Grant, A;
Indirizzi:
Royal Newcastle Hosp, Dept Urol, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia Royal Newcastle Hosp Newcastle NSW Australia 2300 le, NSW 2300, Australia
Titolo Testata:
BJU INTERNATIONAL
fascicolo: 1, volume: 88, anno: 2001,
pagine: 26 - 29
SICI:
1464-4096(200107)88:1<26:TOFOUD>2.0.ZU;2-I
Fonte:
ISI
Lingua:
ENG
Soggetto:
CATHETERIZATION;
Keywords:
urinary retention; intermittent catheterization; indwelling catheter; outcome; urinary tract infection;
Tipo documento:
Article
Natura:
Periodico
Settore Disciplinare:
Clinical Medicine
Citazioni:
6
Recensione:
Indirizzi per estratti:
Indirizzo: Patel, MI 40 Bridge St, Lane Cove, NSW 2066, Australia 40 Bridge St Lane Cove NSW Australia 2066 , NSW 2066, Australia
Citazione:
M.I. Patel et al., "The optimal form of urinary drainage after acute retention of urine", BJU INT, 88(1), 2001, pp. 26-29

Abstract

Objective To assess the outcome of different forms of urinary drainage, particularly for urinary tract infection (UTI), operative findings and patient preference, in patients treated for acute urinary retention (AUR). Patients and methods A feasibility trial was conducted of men presenting with AUR; after a short period of indwelling catheterization (IDC) patients were taught how to use clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC). Patients who failed this were re-catheterized and taught to manage a valve, or failing this a leg bag, and then discharged home. The patients were followed to assess the occurrence of spontaneous voiding, UTI, findings at prostatectomy and patient satisfaction. Results The CISC group (34 men) had a higher rate of spontaneous voiding than the IDC group (16 men: 56% rrs 25%). The incidence of UTI was 32% in the CISC and 75% in the LDC group. At TURF, 20% in the CISC group had a UTI, compared with 69% in the IDC group. Patients using CISC preferred it and had fewer complications than the IDC group, The CISC group had a similar ability to manage and similar acceptance of their method of drainage as the IDCgroup. Conclusion CISC is managed and accepted well by patients who can use the technique and results in fewer UTIs. It should be considered in patients whopresent with AUR, and it may delay surgery.

ASDD Area Sistemi Dipartimentali e Documentali, Università di Bologna, Catalogo delle riviste ed altri periodici
Documento generato il 20/01/20 alle ore 08:01:33