Catalogo Articoli (Spogli Riviste)

OPAC HELP

Titolo:
Conditional root uniqueness points: Psychological validity and perceptual consequences
Autore:
Wurm, LH; Ross, SE;
Indirizzi:
Wayne State Univ, Dept Psychol, Detroit, MI 48202 USA Wayne State Univ Detroit MI USA 48202 Dept Psychol, Detroit, MI 48202 USA Wayne State Univ, Program Linguist, Detroit, MI 48202 USA Wayne State Univ Detroit MI USA 48202 ram Linguist, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
Titolo Testata:
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE
fascicolo: 1, volume: 45, anno: 2001,
pagine: 39 - 57
SICI:
0749-596X(200107)45:1<39:CRUPPV>2.0.ZU;2-9
Fonte:
ISI
Lingua:
ENG
Soggetto:
SPOKEN-WORD-RECOGNITION; LEXICAL ACCESS; SPEECH-PERCEPTION; SEMANTIC ASSOCIATIONS; PREFIXED WORDS; TIME-COURSE; IDENTIFICATION; ACTIVATION; INHIBITION; FREQUENCY;
Keywords:
auditory naming; lexical decision; morphology-language; semantic transparency; speech perception; uniqueness point; word recognition;
Tipo documento:
Article
Natura:
Periodico
Settore Disciplinare:
Social & Behavioral Sciences
Citazioni:
70
Recensione:
Indirizzi per estratti:
Indirizzo: Wurm, LH Wayne State Univ, Dept Psychol, 71 W Warren Ave, Detroit, MI 48202 USA Wayne State Univ 71 W Warren Ave Detroit MI USA 48202 I 48202 USA
Citazione:
L.H. Wurm e S.E. Ross, "Conditional root uniqueness points: Psychological validity and perceptual consequences", J MEM LANG, 45(1), 2001, pp. 39-57

Abstract

Wurm (1997) introduced a construct called the Conditional Root Uniqueness Point (CRUP). which was defined as the uniqueness point of the free root ofa prefixed word, given the prefix in question. Prefixed words with free roots can be divided into two mutually exclusive categories: those with the CRUP at the same phoneme as the full-form uniqueness point (UP). and those where the CRUP precedes the full-form UP by one or more phonemes. Results oftwo reaction-rime experiments indicate a substantial processing advantage for the latter group of words. Regression analyses revealed effects of the number of auditory competitors a target word had. semantic transparency andprefix likelihood. Finally. semantic transparency, root frequency, and number of competitors had different effects, depending upon whether the CRUP of a word coincided with or preceded the full-form UP. Existing models of word recognition need to be modified to accommodate the current results. c 2001 Academic Press.

ASDD Area Sistemi Dipartimentali e Documentali, Università di Bologna, Catalogo delle riviste ed altri periodici
Documento generato il 09/04/20 alle ore 07:39:57