Catalogo Articoli (Spogli Riviste)

OPAC HELP

Titolo:
Comparing smoking cessation interventions for work-site disease management
Autore:
Greenwood, T;
Indirizzi:
Behav Solut, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA Behav Solut Princeton NJ USA 08540Behav Solut, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
Titolo Testata:
DISEASE MANAGEMENT & HEALTH OUTCOMES
fascicolo: 10, volume: 9, anno: 2001,
pagine: 565 - 576
SICI:
1173-8790(2001)9:10<565:CSCIFW>2.0.ZU;2-J
Fonte:
ISI
Lingua:
ENG
Soggetto:
SUSTAINED-RELEASE BUPROPION; NICOTINE REPLACEMENT; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; HEALTH; PATCH; METAANALYSIS; RECRUITMENT; DEPRESSION; THERAPIES; PROGRAMS;
Tipo documento:
Article
Natura:
Periodico
Settore Disciplinare:
Clinical Medicine
Citazioni:
53
Recensione:
Indirizzi per estratti:
Indirizzo: Greenwood, T Behav Solut, 202 Carnegie Ctr,Suite 101, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA Behav Solut 202 Carnegie Ctr,Suite 101 Princeton NJ USA 08540
Citazione:
T. Greenwood, "Comparing smoking cessation interventions for work-site disease management", DIS MANAG H, 9(10), 2001, pp. 565-576

Abstract

Smoking cessation continues to be one of the most cost-effective preventive measures for work-site disease management. The US Public Health Service Clinical Practice Guideline, entitled 'Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence,'provides guidance for evaluating and choosing smoking cessation programs for work sites. Smoking cessation interventions can be characterized by the resource intensity of the effort, the format and methods of interacting with patients andthe focus and objectives of the content. These features are compared with typical group, phone and Internet-based program options. Pharmacotherapy treatment recommendations are reviewed as well as characteristics of first-line nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) medications (e.g. nicotine patch, gum, spray and inhaler) and bupropion. It is suggested that work-site recruitment and participation campaigns mayfail for a variety of reasons including: (i) too narrowly cast recruitmentmessages; (ii) inadequate exposure to campaign messages: (iii) lack or immediate and accessible enrollment mechanisms; and (iv) passive rather than active outreach. Four broad issues to consider when comparing outcomes data from potential smoking cessation programs are: (i) at what follow-up point(s) is the quit rate measured?; (ii) is there a comparison group? (iii) how was quit status determined?; and (iv) how is the status of participants whoare lost to follow-up calculated in the outcomes data?.

ASDD Area Sistemi Dipartimentali e Documentali, Università di Bologna, Catalogo delle riviste ed altri periodici
Documento generato il 04/04/20 alle ore 02:47:10