Catalogo Articoli (Spogli Riviste)

OPAC HELP

Titolo:
The role of participation and control in the effects of computer monitoring on fairness perceptions, task satisfaction, and performance
Autore:
Douthitt, EA; Aiello, JR;
Indirizzi:
Rutgers State Univ, Sch Management & Labor Relat, Dept Human Resource Management, Piscataway, NJ 08855 USA Rutgers State Univ Piscataway NJ USA 08855 ment, Piscataway, NJ 08855 USA Rutgers State Univ, Grad Sch New Brunswick, Dept Psychol, Piscataway, NJ 08855 USA Rutgers State Univ Piscataway NJ USA 08855 chol, Piscataway, NJ 08855 USA
Titolo Testata:
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY
fascicolo: 5, volume: 86, anno: 2001,
pagine: 867 - 874
SICI:
0021-9010(200110)86:5<867:TROPAC>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Fonte:
ISI
Lingua:
ENG
Soggetto:
PROCEDURAL JUSTICE; SOCIAL FACILITATION; JOB-SATISFACTION; PERSONAL CONTROL; VOICE; JUDGMENTS; COMMITMENT; IMPACT;
Tipo documento:
Article
Natura:
Periodico
Settore Disciplinare:
Social & Behavioral Sciences
Citazioni:
42
Recensione:
Indirizzi per estratti:
Indirizzo: Douthitt, EA CUNY Bernard M Baruch Coll, Zicklin Sch Business, 17 Lexington Ave, New York, NY 10010 USA CUNY Bernard M Baruch Coll 17 Lexington Ave New York NY USA 10010
Citazione:
E.A. Douthitt e J.R. Aiello, "The role of participation and control in the effects of computer monitoring on fairness perceptions, task satisfaction, and performance", J APPL PSYC, 86(5), 2001, pp. 867-874

Abstract

Procedural justice and social facilitation theories were used to investigate effects of 2 kinds of process control on fairness perceptions, task satisfaction and performance of complex, computer-monitored tasks. A laboratorystudy manipulated participation (high or low voice) and monitoring approach (monitoring, control over monitoring, or no monitoring). High-voice participants perceived higher justice. Monitored participants reported higher satisfaction with high voice and lower satisfaction with low voice. Task performance was poorer for monitored participants unless they had control over monitoring. Among those with control, performance was not impaired for higher baseline performers. The 2 kinds of process control had different effects on the outcome variables. Results suggest the value of considering variations in the kinds of control provided and the justice principles that may apply in predicting effects of monitoring procedures.

ASDD Area Sistemi Dipartimentali e Documentali, Università di Bologna, Catalogo delle riviste ed altri periodici
Documento generato il 09/07/20 alle ore 17:40:53