Catalogo Articoli (Spogli Riviste)

OPAC HELP

Titolo:
Environmental valuation analysis, public deliberation, and their pragmaticsyntheses: a critical appraisal
Autore:
Niemeyer, S; Spash, CL;
Indirizzi:
Australian Natl Univ, Res Sch Social Sci, Social & Polit Theory Grp, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia Australian Natl Univ Canberra ACT Australia 0200 rra, ACT 0200, Australia Univ Cambridge, Dept Land Econ, Cambridge CB3 9EP, England Univ CambridgeCambridge England CB3 9EP con, Cambridge CB3 9EP, England
Titolo Testata:
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY
fascicolo: 4, volume: 19, anno: 2001,
pagine: 567 - 585
SICI:
0263-774X(200108)19:4<567:EVAPDA>2.0.ZU;2-V
Fonte:
ISI
Lingua:
ENG
Soggetto:
CONTINGENT VALUATION; DECISION-MAKING; POLICY; SUSTAINABILITY; CONCEPTION; ECOSYSTEMS; DEMOCRACY; DISCOURSE; ECONOMICS; VALUES;
Tipo documento:
Article
Natura:
Periodico
Settore Disciplinare:
Social & Behavioral Sciences
Citazioni:
53
Recensione:
Indirizzi per estratti:
Indirizzo: Niemeyer, S Australian Natl Univ, Res Sch Social Sci, Social & Polit Theory Grp, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia Australian Natl Univ Canberra ACT Australia 0200 0, Australia
Citazione:
S. Niemeyer e C.L. Spash, "Environmental valuation analysis, public deliberation, and their pragmaticsyntheses: a critical appraisal", ENVIR PL-C, 19(4), 2001, pp. 567-585

Abstract

This paper explores how theoretical, practical and political issues are addressed differently by cost-benefit analysis and deliberative-participatoryapproaches to environmental policy. Theoretically rigorous approaches may prove to be too narrowly defined and so unsuitable because they neglect therequirements of practical implementation. Yet pragmatism which flaunts theoretical understanding lacks analytical power and can mislead policy. How economic methods, such as contingent valuation, compare with those from political science, such as citizens' juries, is an open question which we attempt to address. In addition, the new hybrid approach of deliberative monetary valuation is critically reviewed. A comparison of these approaches is made which draws out the difficulties of developing practical policy tools which are theoretically grounded and avoid political manipulation.

ASDD Area Sistemi Dipartimentali e Documentali, Università di Bologna, Catalogo delle riviste ed altri periodici
Documento generato il 04/12/20 alle ore 03:19:51