Catalogo Articoli (Spogli Riviste)

OPAC HELP

Titolo:
Are performance appraisal ratings from different rating sources comparable?
Autore:
Facteau, JD; Craig, SB;
Indirizzi:
Auburn Univ, Dept Psychol, Auburn, AL 36849 USA Auburn Univ Auburn AL USA36849 Univ, Dept Psychol, Auburn, AL 36849 USA Kaplan DeVries Inc, Greensboro, NC USA Kaplan DeVries Inc Greensboro NC USA lan DeVries Inc, Greensboro, NC USA
Titolo Testata:
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY
fascicolo: 2, volume: 86, anno: 2001,
pagine: 215 - 227
SICI:
0021-9010(200104)86:2<215:APARFD>2.0.ZU;2-0
Fonte:
ISI
Lingua:
ENG
Soggetto:
CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; MEASUREMENT EQUIVALENCE; MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE; PSYCHOLOGICAL-TESTS; SUPERVISOR RATINGS; SELF-RATINGS; COVARIANCE; SUBORDINATE;
Tipo documento:
Article
Natura:
Periodico
Settore Disciplinare:
Social & Behavioral Sciences
Citazioni:
56
Recensione:
Indirizzi per estratti:
Indirizzo: Facteau, JD Auburn Univ, Dept Psychol, 226 Thach Hall, Auburn, AL 36849 USA Auburn Univ 226 Thach Hall Auburn AL USA 36849 n, AL 36849 USA
Citazione:
J.D. Facteau e S.B. Craig, "Are performance appraisal ratings from different rating sources comparable?", J APPL PSYC, 86(2), 2001, pp. 215-227

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test whether a multisource performance appraisal instrument exhibited measurement invariance across different groupsof raters. Multiple-groups confirmatory factor analysis as well as item response theory (IRT) techniques were used to test for invariance of the rating instrument across self, peer, supervisor, and subordinate raters. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the rating instrument was invariant across these rater groups. The IRT analysis yielded some evidence of differential item and test functioning, but it was limited to the effects of just 3 items and was trivial in magnitude. Taken together, the results suggest that the rating instrument could be regarded as invariantacross the rater groups, thus supporting the practice of directly comparing their ratings. Implications for research and practice are discussed, as well as for understanding the meaning of between-source rating discrepancies.

ASDD Area Sistemi Dipartimentali e Documentali, Università di Bologna, Catalogo delle riviste ed altri periodici
Documento generato il 23/11/20 alle ore 21:39:11