Catalogo Articoli (Spogli Riviste)

OPAC HELP

Titolo:
Adaptive versus reservation-based synchronization protocols - Analysis andcomparison
Autore:
Chen, HSA; Qiao, LT; Nahrstedt, K;
Indirizzi:
Univ Illinois, Dept Comp Sci, Urbana, IL 61801 USA Univ Illinois Urbana IL USA 61801 is, Dept Comp Sci, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
Titolo Testata:
MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS
fascicolo: 3, volume: 14, anno: 2001,
pagine: 219 - 257
SICI:
1380-7501(2001)14:3<219:AVRSP->2.0.ZU;2-E
Fonte:
ISI
Lingua:
ENG
Soggetto:
MULTIMEDIA;
Keywords:
multimedia; synchronization; adaptation; reservation;
Tipo documento:
Article
Natura:
Periodico
Settore Disciplinare:
Engineering, Computing & Technology
Citazioni:
28
Recensione:
Indirizzi per estratti:
Indirizzo: Chen, HSA Univ Illinois, Dept Comp Sci, 1304 W Springfield Ave, Urbana, IL61801 USA Univ Illinois 1304 W Springfield Ave Urbana IL USA 61801 801 USA
Citazione:
H.S.A. Chen et al., "Adaptive versus reservation-based synchronization protocols - Analysis andcomparison", MULTIMED T, 14(3), 2001, pp. 219-257

Abstract

With the expansion of distributed multimedia applications, such as video-phone, video-conference, and video-on-demand, synchronization among various media (time-dependent, time-independent) becomes an integral part of various protocols, mechanisms and services in the underlying computing and communication systems. The current systems allow and provide two different resource management environments where synchronization will be considered: (1) best effort resource management, and (2) reservation-based resource management with differentiation of service classes. Under these two resource management environments, our goal is to analyze and compare the design, implementation, and performance of synchronization protocols and services. Our approach to accomplish this complex analysis is inductive, because we select a representative protocol from each group, and consider an adaptive synchronization protocol on top of the best effort resource management and a reservation-based synchronization protocol on top of the reservation-based resource management. We believe that both protocols include a rich set of known synchronization algorithms and mechanisms, hence our resulting analysis and comparison show: (1) trade-offs/difference in design complexity of the synchronization protocols (space and time), (2) trade-offs/difference in implementation complexity of the synchronization protocols (space and time), and (3)magnitude of performance changes.

ASDD Area Sistemi Dipartimentali e Documentali, Università di Bologna, Catalogo delle riviste ed altri periodici
Documento generato il 04/08/20 alle ore 19:18:50