Catalogo Articoli (Spogli Riviste)

OPAC HELP

Titolo:
Field performance of PM2.5 Federal Reference Method samplers
Autore:
Peters, TM; Norris, GA; Vanderpool, RW; Gemmill, DB; Wiener, RW; Murdoch, RW; McElroy, FF; Pitchford, M;
Indirizzi:
Res Triangle Inst, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA Res Triangle Inst Res Triangle Pk NC USA 27709 Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA US EPA, Natl Exposure Res Lab, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA US EPA Res Triangle Pk NC USA 27711 es Lab, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA US EPA, Off Air Qual Planning & Stand, Las Vegas, NV 89193 USA US EPA LasVegas NV USA 89193 l Planning & Stand, Las Vegas, NV 89193 USA
Titolo Testata:
AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
fascicolo: 5, volume: 34, anno: 2001,
pagine: 433 - 443
SICI:
0278-6826(200105)34:5<433:FPOPFR>2.0.ZU;2-L
Fonte:
ISI
Lingua:
ENG
Soggetto:
AIR; IMPACTORS; SIZE;
Tipo documento:
Article
Natura:
Periodico
Settore Disciplinare:
Engineering, Computing & Technology
Citazioni:
11
Recensione:
Indirizzi per estratti:
Indirizzo: Vanderpool, RW Res Triangle Inst, 3040 Cornwallis Rd, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA Res Triangle Inst 3040 Cornwallis Rd Res Triangle Pk NC USA 27709
Citazione:
T.M. Peters et al., "Field performance of PM2.5 Federal Reference Method samplers", AEROS SCI T, 34(5), 2001, pp. 433-443

Abstract

The results of several research field studies were evaluated to estimate the precision and bias of various designated PM2,5 Federal Reference Method (FRM) samplers. Precision was favorable in these carefully conducted research studies where all operational activities were strictly controlled, with an average coefficient of variation (CV) ranging from 2 to 6%. No significant bias was found between the method designations, Comparisons between the designated reference method samplers meet the EPA Equivalent Method Criteria for comparability except for one pair of samplers, In this instance, the y-intercept of the Andersen RAAS2.5-300 versus the Rupprecht & Patashnick Partisol-Plus 2025 was 1.07 mug/m(3), slightly exceeding they-intercept 1.0 mug/m(3) limit. Non-designated PM2.5 samplers demonstrated strong linear relationships when compared to reference method samplers; however, the comparisons presented in this analysis did not meet the EPA Subpart C criteria. These results indicate that the currently designated reference method samplers should allow precision and bias objectives to be achieved for the National PM2.5 Network.

ASDD Area Sistemi Dipartimentali e Documentali, Università di Bologna, Catalogo delle riviste ed altri periodici
Documento generato il 14/08/20 alle ore 07:17:47