Catalogo Articoli (Spogli Riviste)

OPAC HELP

Titolo:
Issues of consensus and debate for economic evaluation in rheumatology
Autore:
Coyle, D; Welch, V; Shea, B; Gabriel, S; Drummond, M; Tugwell, P;
Indirizzi:
Univ Ottawa, Fac Med, Clin Epidemiol Unit, Loeb Hlth Res Inst, Ottawa, ON,Canada Univ Ottawa Ottawa ON Canada Unit, Loeb Hlth Res Inst, Ottawa, ON,Canada Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Dept Hlth Sci Res, Rochester, MN 55905 USA Mayo Clin& Mayo Fdn Rochester MN USA 55905 Res, Rochester, MN 55905 USA Univ York, Ctr Hlth Econ, York YO1 5DD, N Yorkshire, England Univ York York N Yorkshire England YO1 5DD YO1 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
Titolo Testata:
JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
fascicolo: 3, volume: 28, anno: 2001,
pagine: 642 - 647
SICI:
0315-162X(200103)28:3<642:IOCADF>2.0.ZU;2-A
Fonte:
ISI
Lingua:
ENG
Soggetto:
COST-EFFECTIVENESS; THERAPY; LIFE;
Keywords:
cost-effectiveness analysis; standardization; survey; methodology;
Tipo documento:
Article
Natura:
Periodico
Settore Disciplinare:
Clinical Medicine
Life Sciences
Citazioni:
24
Recensione:
Indirizzi per estratti:
Indirizzo: Coyle, D Ottawa Hosp, Clin Epidemiol Unit, 1053 Carling Ave, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada Ottawa Hosp 1053 Carling Ave Ottawa ON Canada K1Y 4E9 4E9, Canada
Citazione:
D. Coyle et al., "Issues of consensus and debate for economic evaluation in rheumatology", J RHEUMATOL, 28(3), 2001, pp. 642-647

Abstract

We report initial attempts at developing standards for the conduct of economic evaluations in rheumatology. We surveyed 25 clinicians and economists with an interest in rheumatology regarding the design and reporting of economic evaluations, with particular reference to 4 clinical scenarios relating to treatment for rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, and osteoporosis. The results demonstrated widespread agreement on a number of methodologicalissues such as statement of funding source, perspective, discounting, and allowance for uncertainty. However, there was lack of consensus over clinical variables including sources of data for efficacy estimates, specific clinical outcomes, methods of assessing quality of life,and choice of comparators. Some of the disagreement reflects lack of consensus in current generalmethodological guidelines, Consensus regarding the disease-specific clinical variables is crucial to standardizing analysis and facilitating comparisons within clinical scenarios.

ASDD Area Sistemi Dipartimentali e Documentali, Università di Bologna, Catalogo delle riviste ed altri periodici
Documento generato il 18/01/21 alle ore 16:02:31