Catalogo Articoli (Spogli Riviste)

OPAC HELP

Titolo:
Cross-modal feature and conjunction errors in recognition memory
Autore:
Jones, TC; Jacoby, LL; Gellis, LA;
Indirizzi:
Victoria Univ Wellington, Sch Psychol, Wellington, New Zealand Victoria Univ Wellington Wellington New Zealand Wellington, New Zealand NYU, New York, NY USA NYU New York NY USANYU, New York, NY USA Washington Univ, St Louis, MO USA Washington Univ St Louis MO USAWashington Univ, St Louis, MO USA Univ Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152 USA Univ Memphis Memphis TN USA 38152Univ Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
Titolo Testata:
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE
fascicolo: 1, volume: 44, anno: 2001,
pagine: 131 - 152
SICI:
0749-596X(200101)44:1<131:CFACEI>2.0.ZU;2-R
Fonte:
ISI
Lingua:
ENG
Soggetto:
WORD-FRAGMENT COMPLETION; RECOLLECTIVE EXPERIENCE; IMPLICIT MEMORY; PERCEPTUAL FLUENCY; TIME-COURSE; FAMILIARITY; ATTENTION; DISSOCIATIONS; REPETITION; JUDGMENTS;
Keywords:
recognition memory; false recognition; feature errors; conjunction errors; modality effect; recollection; familiarity; dual-process theory;
Tipo documento:
Article
Natura:
Periodico
Settore Disciplinare:
Social & Behavioral Sciences
Citazioni:
69
Recensione:
Indirizzi per estratti:
Indirizzo: Jones, TC Victoria Univ Wellington, Sch Psychol, POB 600, Wellington, New Zealand Victoria Univ Wellington POB 600 Wellington New Zealand ealand
Citazione:
T.C. Jones et al., "Cross-modal feature and conjunction errors in recognition memory", J MEM LANG, 44(1), 2001, pp. 131-152

Abstract

Four experiments were conducted to investigate whether a modality-specificfamiliarity contributes to feature and conjunction errors and, hence, to recognition memory. In each experiment, the presentation modality of compound welds was manipulated at study (auditory or visual), and in Experiment 2 the presentation modality for the test also was manipulated. In Experiment 3. participants were pushed to respond quickly in order to create a reliance on familiarity rather than recollection. In Experiment 4, a direct manipulation of response deadline was employed. Across experiments, auditory and visual tests did not produce different hit tares or feature and conjunctionerror rates, and shifts in study-to-test modality did not affect hit ratesor feature and conjunction error rates. The response deadline manipulationof Experiment 4 affected old/new discrimination but not feature and conjunction effects (feature/new and conjunction/new discrimination), producing adissociation. Unlike implicit perceptual memory, modality information doesnot appear to contribute significantly to the familiarity underlying feature and conjunction errors. The familiarity underlying feature and conjunction errors, and thus in recognition memory, is different from the familiarity underlying perceptual implicit memory. (C) 2001 Academic Press.

ASDD Area Sistemi Dipartimentali e Documentali, Università di Bologna, Catalogo delle riviste ed altri periodici
Documento generato il 05/04/20 alle ore 21:58:03