Catalogo Articoli (Spogli Riviste)

OPAC HELP

Titolo:
Prevalence of dissociative disorders in psychiatric in-patients: the impact of study characteristics
Autore:
Friedl, MC; Draijer, N; de Jonge, P;
Indirizzi:
Psychiat Hosp Willibrord, Heiloo, Netherlands Psychiat Hosp Willibrord Heiloo Netherlands ibrord, Heiloo, Netherlands Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Psychiat, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands Vrije Univ Amsterdam Amsterdam Netherlands NL-1081 HV erdam, Netherlands
Titolo Testata:
ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA
fascicolo: 6, volume: 102, anno: 2000,
pagine: 423 - 428
SICI:
0001-690X(200012)102:6<423:PODDIP>2.0.ZU;2-T
Fonte:
ISI
Lingua:
ENG
Soggetto:
MULTIPLE PERSONALITY-DISORDER; INPATIENTS; POPULATION; FREQUENCY; VALIDITY; SCALE;
Keywords:
dissociative disorders; prevalence; meta-analysis;
Tipo documento:
Article
Natura:
Periodico
Settore Disciplinare:
Social & Behavioral Sciences
Clinical Medicine
Life Sciences
Citazioni:
23
Recensione:
Indirizzi per estratti:
Indirizzo: Draijer, N Valeriusklin, Dept Psychiat, Valeriuspl 9, NL-1075 BG Amsterdam, Netherlands Valeriusklin Valeriuspl 9 Amsterdam Netherlands NL-1075 BG nds
Citazione:
M.C. Friedl et al., "Prevalence of dissociative disorders in psychiatric in-patients: the impact of study characteristics", ACT PSYC SC, 102(6), 2000, pp. 423-428

Abstract

Objective: Prevalence rates for dissociative disorders among psychiatric in-patients vary widely. The aim of this meta-analysis is to offer an explanation for these differences. Method: Prevalence studies using a clinical diagnostic interview among psychiatric in-patients were included. Hypotheses concerning the impact of blind versus not blind designs, choice of diagnostic instrument and continental background were tested. Results: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. In blind studies the prevalence rate for dissociative disorders was significantly lower (but not for DID). Studies using the SCID-D (compared to the DDIS) and European studies had significantly lower prevalence rates for both dissociative disorders as well as for DID. Conclusion: The choice of diagnostic instrument and cultural differences in interpretation of symptoms are major explanations for differences in prevalence of dissociative disorders and DID. Comparative, blind research usingboth DDIS and SCID-D in the assessment of dissociative disorders is advised.

ASDD Area Sistemi Dipartimentali e Documentali, Università di Bologna, Catalogo delle riviste ed altri periodici
Documento generato il 21/09/20 alle ore 01:02:15