Catalogo Articoli (Spogli Riviste)

OPAC HELP

Titolo:
How are we doing? The impact of motives and information use on the evaluation of romantic relationships
Autore:
Wayment, HA; Campbell, S;
Indirizzi:
No Arizona Univ, Dept Psychol, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA No Arizona Univ Flagstaff AZ USA 86011 t Psychol, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA Middlebury Coll, Middlebury, VT 05753 USA Middlebury Coll Middlebury VT USA 05753 ry Coll, Middlebury, VT 05753 USA
Titolo Testata:
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS
fascicolo: 1, volume: 17, anno: 2000,
pagine: 31 - 52
SICI:
0265-4075(200002)17:1<31:HAWDTI>2.0.ZU;2-R
Fonte:
ISI
Lingua:
ENG
Soggetto:
SELF-VERIFICATION STRIVINGS; CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS; POSITIVE ILLUSIONS; SEARCH; ENHANCEMENT; COMMITMENT; PERCEPTION; STANDARDS; KNOWLEDGE; FEEDBACK;
Keywords:
evaluation motives; personal standards; relationship evaluation;
Tipo documento:
Article
Natura:
Periodico
Settore Disciplinare:
Social & Behavioral Sciences
Citazioni:
41
Recensione:
Indirizzi per estratti:
Indirizzo: Wayment, HA No Arizona Univ, Dept Psychol, POB 15106, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA No Arizona Univ POB 15106 Flagstaff AZ USA 86011 AZ 86011 USA
Citazione:
H.A. Wayment e S. Campbell, "How are we doing? The impact of motives and information use on the evaluation of romantic relationships", J SOC PERS, 17(1), 2000, pp. 31-52

Abstract

A multidimensional model of self-evaluation was modified to examine individuals' perceptions of how they evaluate their romantic relationships. Participants provided estimates of the frequency and usefulness of 10 types of information (objective information, feedback from others, personal standards, feared future relationships, future ideals, positive and negative past relationship information, upward, lateral, and downward social comparison) for meeting four motives (enhancement, improvement, verification, and accuracy) in the context of a romantic relationship. Results from three studies indicate th at, overall, personal standards, objective information, and future ideals information were perceived as being used most often to evaluate one's romantic relationship. These types of information were reported as being most useful for meeting all four motives. Social comparison information was reported as least useful and used least often for relationship evaluation. The discussion focuses on the usefulness of considering multiple motivesand information types in order to understand how individuals may be evaluating their romantic relationships.

ASDD Area Sistemi Dipartimentali e Documentali, Università di Bologna, Catalogo delle riviste ed altri periodici
Documento generato il 06/07/20 alle ore 08:15:31