Catalogo Articoli (Spogli Riviste)

OPAC HELP

Titolo:
PACS in sonography: Accuracy of interpretation using film compared with monitor display
Autore:
Hertzberg, BS; Kliewer, MA; Paulson, EK; Sheafor, DH; Freed, KS; Bowie, JD; Carroll, BA; DeLong, DH; Nelson, RC;
Indirizzi:
Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Durham, NC 27710 USA Duke Univ Durham NCUSA 27710 Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
Titolo Testata:
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY
fascicolo: 5, volume: 173, anno: 1999,
pagine: 1175 - 1179
SICI:
0361-803X(199911)173:5<1175:PISAOI>2.0.ZU;2-0
Fonte:
ISI
Lingua:
ENG
Soggetto:
OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC ANALYSIS; COMMUNICATION-SYSTEM; COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY; SOFT-COPY; TELERADIOLOGY WORKSTATION; OBSERVER PERFORMANCE; CHEST RADIOGRAPHY; DIGITAL DISPLAYS; PICTURE; IMAGES;
Tipo documento:
Article
Natura:
Periodico
Settore Disciplinare:
Clinical Medicine
Life Sciences
Citazioni:
31
Recensione:
Indirizzi per estratti:
Indirizzo: Hertzberg, BS Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Box 3808,Rm 2526,Blue Zone S, Durham, NC 27710 USA Duke Univ Box 3808,Rm 2526,Blue Zone S Durham NC USA 27710 A
Citazione:
B.S. Hertzberg et al., "PACS in sonography: Accuracy of interpretation using film compared with monitor display", AM J ROENTG, 173(5), 1999, pp. 1175-1179

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The goal of this study was to determine the relative accuracy of interpretation of sonography when viewed on a monitor or on film. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Four radiologists twice interpreted a series of 440sonograms using the following sequences of display formats for initial andsecond interpretations: film-film, film-monitor, monitor-film, and monitor-monitor. Reporting discrepancies between the initial and subsequent interpretation were reviewed by an arbitration panel unaware of the display mode. Results were analyzed for differences in error rate attributable to film versus monitor display format, chronology of interpretation, individual observer, and observer seniority. RESULTS. We found no statistically significant difference in the error rate for film (10.3%) versus monitor display format (14.6%) (p = .09). Likewise, we found no significant differences in the error rates attributable to chronology of interpretation (p = .13), individual observer (p = .54), or observer seniority (p = .87). CONCLUSION. Interpretative accuracy is similar whether sonograms are interpreted on a monitor or on film.

ASDD Area Sistemi Dipartimentali e Documentali, Università di Bologna, Catalogo delle riviste ed altri periodici
Documento generato il 10/07/20 alle ore 12:47:20