Catalogo Articoli (Spogli Riviste)

OPAC HELP

Titolo:
Do morning report format changes affect educational content?
Autore:
DAlessandro, DM; Qian, F;
Indirizzi:
Univ Iowa, Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA Univ Iowa Iowa City IA USA 52242 ed, Dept Pediat, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
Titolo Testata:
MEDICAL EDUCATION
fascicolo: 9, volume: 33, anno: 1999,
pagine: 648 - 654
SICI:
0308-0110(199909)33:9<648:DMRFCA>2.0.ZU;2-U
Fonte:
ISI
Lingua:
ENG
Keywords:
curriculum; evaluation studies; medical graduate education, methods; paediatrics, education; reaching hospitals;
Tipo documento:
Article
Natura:
Periodico
Settore Disciplinare:
Clinical Medicine
Citazioni:
12
Recensione:
Indirizzi per estratti:
Indirizzo: D'Alessandro, DM Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Dept Pediat, 200 Hawkins Dr, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin 200 Hawkins Dr Iowa City IA USA 52242
Citazione:
D.M. D'Alessandro e F. Qian, "Do morning report format changes affect educational content?", MED EDUC, 33(9), 1999, pp. 648-654

Abstract

Objective The goal of this prospective observational study was to determine if format changes in a paediatric morning report conference affected the educational content presented. Design Case presentations during paediatric morning report at the University of Iowa during the academic years 1995-96 (Format I;1 - formal presentations) and 1996-97 (Format 2 - formal presentations) were analysed for demographics, clinical Venues where patients were encountered, case diagnoses and ensuing discussion. A 10-item questionnaire of participants' attitudes was conducted during May 1997. Setting Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa. Subjects Paediatric residency trainees. Results The number of cases was significantly decreased from 4 to 3.2 per morning report session. A wide variety of patient ages and all clinical venues were represented in both formats. Case diagnoses covered 30 of SI Pediatrics Review and Education Program (PREP, American Academy of Pediatrics, Elk. Grove Village, IL, USA) Content Specification Headings during Format I vs. 29 of 31 during Format 2. The most common headings were the same. Patient evaluations were discussed less and patient clinical presentations and pathophysiology were discussed more during Format 2. Participants rated Format 2 higher; 54% of participants wanted to continue this format and 16% wanted a combination of both formats. Conclusions This research suggests that while format changes in paediatricmorning report resulted in a 20% decrease in the number of cases presented, only relatively small changes in the overall educational content occurred. Changes in educational programmes should be accompanied by educational evaluation.

ASDD Area Sistemi Dipartimentali e Documentali, Università di Bologna, Catalogo delle riviste ed altri periodici
Documento generato il 16/07/20 alle ore 06:13:26