Catalogo Articoli (Spogli Riviste)

OPAC HELP

Titolo:
Continuous medical education in German anaesthesia departments - Findings from a survey-questionnaire
Autore:
Boldt, J; Huttner, I; Haisch, G;
Indirizzi:
Klinikum Stadt Ludwigshafen, Klin Anasthesiol & Operative Intensivmed, D-67063 Ludwigshafen, Germany Klinikum Stadt Ludwigshafen Ludwigshafen Germany D-67063 shafen, Germany
Titolo Testata:
ANASTHESIOLOGIE & INTENSIVMEDIZIN
fascicolo: 7-8, volume: 40, anno: 1999,
pagine: 577 - 582
SICI:
0170-5334(199907/08)40:7-8<577:CMEIGA>2.0.ZU;2-M
Fonte:
ISI
Lingua:
GER
Soggetto:
ANESTHETISTS;
Keywords:
anaesthesia; critical care; personnel, hospital; education, continuing; literature;
Tipo documento:
Article
Natura:
Periodico
Settore Disciplinare:
Clinical Medicine
Citazioni:
9
Recensione:
Indirizzi per estratti:
Indirizzo: Boldt, J Klinikum Stadt Ludwigshafen, Klin Anasthesiol & Operative Intensivmed, Bremserstr 79, D-67063 Ludwigshafen, Germany Klinikum Stadt Ludwigshafen Bremserstr 79 Ludwigshafen Germany D-67063
Citazione:
J. Boldt et al., "Continuous medical education in German anaesthesia departments - Findings from a survey-questionnaire", ANASTH INTM, 40(7-8), 1999, pp. 577-582

Abstract

Continupus medical education (CME) is important for guaranteeing the quality of patients' treatment. The extent of CME in German anaesthesia departments was analysed by means of a survey- questionnaire. 7 university anaesthesia departments, 12 hospitals with >1,000 beds, 20 hospitals with 500 to 1,000 beds, and 15 hospitals with <500 beds were selected by random sample. 453 questionnaires were sent back and analysed. 10% of the answers were fromuniversity hospitals, 26% from hospitals >1,000 beds, 30% from hospitals with 500-1,000 beds, and 30% from hospitals <500 beds. Journals were assessed to be of highest importance for CME (most important: 57%, 1-4 hrs/week).,,The Anaesthesist" was considered as the most important journal (33% of allanswers; not available only for 6%). The internet was assessed as very important by 32%, as important by 54%, and as unimportant by 14% of the answers. The German Congress of Anaesthesiology was the most often frequented meeting (29% of all answers), whereas international ones were very rarely attended. 75% of all answers declaired that they have to pay for their meeting,only few got support from their hospital and department, respectively. Themajority evaluated the extent and quality of CME as good, 14%, however, assessed the CME as less sufficient. The findings from the survey-questionnaire appear to vary widely among German anaesthetists. It should be discussedwhether standardisation and quality control of CME would be helpful to guarantee a high standard of patients' management.

ASDD Area Sistemi Dipartimentali e Documentali, Università di Bologna, Catalogo delle riviste ed altri periodici
Documento generato il 16/07/20 alle ore 16:45:51