Catalogo Articoli (Spogli Riviste)

OPAC HELP

Titolo:
Three-dimensional laparoscopy - Gadget or progress? A randomized trial on the efficacy of three-dimensional laparoscopy
Autore:
Mueller, MD; Camartin, C; Dreher, E; Hanggi, W;
Indirizzi:
Univ Bern, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland Univ Bern Bern Switzerland CH-3012 l & Obstet, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
Titolo Testata:
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
fascicolo: 5, volume: 13, anno: 1999,
pagine: 469 - 472
SICI:
0930-2794(199905)13:5<469:TL-GOP>2.0.ZU;2-2
Fonte:
ISI
Lingua:
ENG
Soggetto:
SURGERY; SYSTEMS;
Keywords:
laparoscopy; three-dimensional laparoscopy;
Tipo documento:
Article
Natura:
Periodico
Settore Disciplinare:
Clinical Medicine
Citazioni:
9
Recensione:
Indirizzi per estratti:
Indirizzo: Mueller, MD Univndern, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Schanzeneckstr 1, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerla Univ Bern Schanzeneckstr 1 Bern Switzerland CH-3012 Switzerla
Citazione:
M.D. Mueller et al., "Three-dimensional laparoscopy - Gadget or progress? A randomized trial on the efficacy of three-dimensional laparoscopy", SURG ENDOSC, 13(5), 1999, pp. 469-472

Abstract

Background: This study was designed to compare conventional laparoscopy with three-dimensional (3-D) laparoscopy. Method: Thirty candidates, 20 inexperienced and 10 experienced in operative laparoscopy, executed standardized exercises on a pelvitrainer. The candidates were randomized to two groups. Group A executed the exercises first with the conventional and then with the three-dimensional system. Group B accomplished the exercises in the reverse sequence. At the end of the exercises, the candidates answered specific questions about the two systems. Results: A total of 21 h 6 min 6 sec of laparoscopic exercises were analyzed-10 h 8 min 1 sec with the conventional and 10 h 58 min 5 sec with the three-dimensional system (p = 0.38). Group A required 12 h 26 min 56 sec to perform all the exercises. There was no statistically significant differencefrom group B, where the candidates needed 8 h 39 min 10 sec (p = 0.14). Neither were there any differences in the number of failed attempts between the two groups. There were also no statistical difference when the results obtained from the candidates without experience in laparoscopy and the participants experienced in operative laparoscopy were analyzed separately. Boththe inexperienced and the experienced candidates became tired earlier, hadmore headaches, and needed extra time to adapt to the 3-D system. Conclusion: When analyzed in a standardized fashion, 3-D laparoscopy does not have any significant advantages over conventional laparoscopy.

ASDD Area Sistemi Dipartimentali e Documentali, Università di Bologna, Catalogo delle riviste ed altri periodici
Documento generato il 25/11/20 alle ore 04:23:34