Catalogo Articoli (Spogli Riviste)

OPAC HELP

Titolo:
PEER AND SUBORDINATE PERFORMANCE-APPRAISAL MEASUREMENT EQUIVALENCE
Autore:
MAURER TJ; RAJU NS; COLLINS WC;
Indirizzi:
GEORGIA INST TECHNOL,SCH PSYCHOL ATLANTA GA 30332 IIT,INST PSYCHOL CHICAGO IL 60616 TOWERS PERRIN INC ATLANTA GA 00000
Titolo Testata:
Journal of applied psychology
fascicolo: 5, volume: 83, anno: 1998,
pagine: 693 - 702
SICI:
0021-9010(1998)83:5<693:PASPME>2.0.ZU;2-C
Fonte:
ISI
Lingua:
ENG
Soggetto:
MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE;
Tipo documento:
Article
Natura:
Periodico
Settore Disciplinare:
Physical, Chemical & Earth Sciences
Citazioni:
22
Recensione:
Indirizzi per estratti:
Citazione:
T.J. Maurer et al., "PEER AND SUBORDINATE PERFORMANCE-APPRAISAL MEASUREMENT EQUIVALENCE", Journal of applied psychology, 83(5), 1998, pp. 693-702

Abstract

Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and item response theory (IRT) were applied to determine the extent to which peer and subordinate ratings of managers on a team-building skill dimension are directly comparable. Simultaneous CFA in the 2 groups of raters suggested that the 2 sets of ratings are calibrated equivalently, and polytomous IRT methods led to similar conclusions. The results were replicated in independentsamples of raters. These are encouraging results for practitioners orresearchers who compare ratings from these 2 groups. In addition to presenting the empirical findings from the study and illustrating how CFA and IRT methods of testing measurement equivalence compare, the article shows the unique types of information about performance appraisals that IRT and CFA can provide to researchers and practitioners, with implications for future research.

ASDD Area Sistemi Dipartimentali e Documentali, Università di Bologna, Catalogo delle riviste ed altri periodici
Documento generato il 30/11/20 alle ore 19:38:25