Catalogo Articoli (Spogli Riviste)

OPAC HELP

Titolo:
INTERNAL VALIDITY OF PROJECT MATCH TREATMENTS - DISCRIMINABILITY AND INTEGRITY
Autore:
CARROLL KM; CONNORS GJ; COONEY NL; DICLEMENTE CC; DONOVAN DM; KADDEN RR; LONGABAUGH RL; ROUNSAVILLE BJ; WIRTZ PW; ZWEBEN A;
Indirizzi:
SUBST ABUSE CTR,ROOM S208,34 PARK ST NEW HAVEN CT 06519 YALE UNIV,SCH MED NEW HAVEN CT 06520 RES INST ADDICT BUFFALO NY 14203 UNIV MARYLAND BALTIMORE CTY BALTIMORE MD 21228 UNIV CONNECTICUT,SCH MED STORRS CT 06269 BROWN UNIV PROVIDENCE RI 02912 GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIV WASHINGTON DC 20052 UNIV WISCONSIN MADISON WI 53706 UNIV WASHINGTON SEATTLE WA 98195
Titolo Testata:
Journal of consulting and clinical psychology
fascicolo: 2, volume: 66, anno: 1998,
pagine: 290 - 303
SICI:
0022-006X(1998)66:2<290:IVOPMT>2.0.ZU;2-F
Fonte:
ISI
Lingua:
ENG
Soggetto:
INTERPERSONAL THERAPY; DEPRESSION; ADHERENCE;
Tipo documento:
Article
Natura:
Periodico
Settore Disciplinare:
Physical, Chemical & Earth Sciences
Citazioni:
36
Recensione:
Indirizzi per estratti:
Citazione:
K.M. Carroll et al., "INTERNAL VALIDITY OF PROJECT MATCH TREATMENTS - DISCRIMINABILITY AND INTEGRITY", Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 66(2), 1998, pp. 290-303

Abstract

Project MATCH (Matching Alcoholism Treatments to Client Heterogeneity) is a multisite collaborative project designed to evaluate patient-treatment interactions in alcoholism treatment. To evaluate whether major threats to the internal validity of the independent (treatment) variable in Project MATCH could be ruled out, we investigated several aspects of treatment integrity and discriminability. In this study, 1.726 alcohol-dependent participants at 10 sites were randomized to 3 treatments: cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT), motivational enhancement therapy (MET), and 12-step facilitation (TSF). Participants received treatment either as outpatients or as aftercare following a more intensive inpatient or day hospital treatment. For both the outpatient and aftercare arms of the study, treatments were discriminable in that therapists implemented each of the treatments according to manual guidelines and rarely used techniques associated with comparison approaches. Participants received a high level of exposure to their study treatments, and the intended contrast in treatment dose between MET and the 2 more intensive treatments (CBT and TSF) was obtained. Alcoholics Anonymous involvement was significantly higher for participants assigned to TSF versus MET or CBT, whereas the treatments did not differ in utilization of other nonstudy treatments. Nonspecific aspects of treatment such as therapist skillfulness and level of the therapeutic alliance were comparable across treatment conditions.

ASDD Area Sistemi Dipartimentali e Documentali, Università di Bologna, Catalogo delle riviste ed altri periodici
Documento generato il 06/06/20 alle ore 01:49:07