Catalogo Articoli (Spogli Riviste)

OPAC HELP

Titolo:
EFFICACY OF PERCUTANEOUS VASCULAR HEMOSTASIS SYSTEM PROSTAR - COMPARISON TO MANUAL COMPRESSION
Autore:
MURAMATSU T; TSUKAHARA R; AKIMOTO N; HOH M; ITO S;
Indirizzi:
HLTH INSURANCE GEN KAWASKI CENT HOSP,DIV CARDIOL,KAWASAKI KU,2-9-1 TAMACHI KANAGAWA JAPAN
Titolo Testata:
Journal of interventional cardiology
fascicolo: 6, volume: 10, anno: 1997,
pagine: 427 - 434
SICI:
0896-4327(1997)10:6<427:EOPVHS>2.0.ZU;2-4
Fonte:
ISI
Lingua:
ENG
Soggetto:
CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY; COMPLICATIONS;
Tipo documento:
Article
Natura:
Periodico
Citazioni:
12
Recensione:
Indirizzi per estratti:
Citazione:
T. Muramatsu et al., "EFFICACY OF PERCUTANEOUS VASCULAR HEMOSTASIS SYSTEM PROSTAR - COMPARISON TO MANUAL COMPRESSION", Journal of interventional cardiology, 10(6), 1997, pp. 427-434

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of the percutaneous vascular surgery device (Prostar) for sealing the femoral artery puncture site after coronary interventions. We also compared the resultswith Prostar (n = 167) and conventional manual compression methods (n= 50) in a nonrandomized fashion. The average time to hemostasis in the Prostar system group was 13.5 minutes, versus 36.6 minutes in the compression group. The average time to ambulation was 2.2 hours in the Prostar system group, versus 17.8 hours in the manual group. Bleeding was observed in 1.2% of the subjects in the Prostar system group, versus 12% in the manual compression group. One emergency surgery was required in the manual compression group, whereas no surgical interventionwas required in the Prostar group. We conclude that the Prostar system for percutaneous vascular closure appears to be a safe technique forachieving an early hemostasis and ambulation after coronary intervention.

ASDD Area Sistemi Dipartimentali e Documentali, Università di Bologna, Catalogo delle riviste ed altri periodici
Documento generato il 22/09/20 alle ore 20:11:59