Catalogo Articoli (Spogli Riviste)

OPAC HELP

Titolo:
Dictated versus database-generated discharge summaries: a randomized clinical trial
Autore:
van Walraven, C; Laupacis, A; Seth, R; Wells, G;
Indirizzi:
Univ Ottawa, Dept Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada Univ Ottawa Ottawa ON CanadaUniv Ottawa, Dept Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada Univ Ottawa, Loeb Res Inst, Clin Epidemiol Unit, Ottawa, ON, Canada Univ Ottawa Ottawa ON Canada st, Clin Epidemiol Unit, Ottawa, ON, Canada
Titolo Testata:
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL
fascicolo: 3, volume: 160, anno: 1999,
pagine: 319 - 326
SICI:
0820-3946(19990209)160:3<319:DVDDSA>2.0.ZU;2-M
Fonte:
ISI
Lingua:
ENG
Soggetto:
HOSPITAL DOCTORS; DATA-BASE; SURGICAL-AUDIT; COMPUTER; PRACTITIONERS; SYSTEM; COMMUNICATION; RECORD;
Tipo documento:
Article
Natura:
Periodico
Settore Disciplinare:
Clinical Medicine
Life Sciences
Citazioni:
46
Recensione:
Indirizzi per estratti:
Indirizzo: van Walraven, C Ottawarling, Clin Epidemiol Unit, Loeb Res Inst, Rm F660,Civ Campus,1053 Ca Ottawa Hosp Rm F660,Civ Campus,1053 Carling Ave Ottawa ONCanada K1Y 4E9
Citazione:
C. van Walraven et al., "Dictated versus database-generated discharge summaries: a randomized clinical trial", CAN MED A J, 160(3), 1999, pp. 319-326

Abstract

Background: Hospital discharge summaries communicate information necessaryfor continuing patient care. They are most commonly generated by voice dictation and are often of poor quality. The objective of this study was to compare discharge summaries created by voice dictation with those generated from a clinical database. Methods: A randomized clinical trial was performed in which discharge summaries for patients discharged from a general Internal medicine service at atertiary care teaching hospital in Ottawa were created by voice dictation (151 patients) or from a database (142 patients). Patients had been admitted between September 1996 and June 1997. The trial was preceded by a baseline. cohort study in which all summaries were created by dictation. For the database group, information on forms completed by housestaff was entered into a database and collated into a discharge summary. For the dictation group, housestaff dictated narrative letters. The proportion of patients for whom a summary was generated within 4 weeks of discharge was recorded. Physicians receiving the summary rated its quality, completeness, organization andtimeliness on a 100-mm visual analogue scale. Housestaff preference was also determined. Results: Patients in the database group and the dictation group were similar. A summary was much more likely to be generated within 4 weeks of discharge for patients in the database group than for those in the dictation group (113 [79.6%] v. 86 [57.0%]; p < 0.001). Summary quality was similar (meanrating 72.7 [standard deviation (SD) 19.3] v; 74.9 [SD 16.6]), as were assessments of completeness (73.4 [SD 19.8] v. 78.2 [SD 14.9]), organization (77.4 [SD 16.3] v. 79.3 [SD 17.2]) and timeliness (70.3 [SD 21.9] v. 66.2 [SD 25.6]). Many information items of interest were more likely to be included in the database-generated summaries. The database system created summaries faster and was preferred by housestaff. Dictated summaries in the baseline and randomized studies were similar, which indicated that the control group was not substantially different from the baseline cohort. Interpretation: The database system significantly increased the likelihoodthat a discharge summary was created. Housestaff preferred the database system for summary generation. Physicians thought that the quality of summaries generated by the 2 methods was similar. The use of computer databases tocreate hospital discharge summaries is promising and merits further study and refinement.

ASDD Area Sistemi Dipartimentali e Documentali, Università di Bologna, Catalogo delle riviste ed altri periodici
Documento generato il 04/07/20 alle ore 16:22:34