Catalogo Articoli (Spogli Riviste)

OPAC HELP

Titolo:
A GROUP DECISION-SUPPORT FRAMEWORK FOR CONSENSUS RANKING OF TECHNICALMANAGER CANDIDATES
Autore:
TAVANA M; KENNEDY DT; JOGLEKAR P;
Indirizzi:
LA SALLE UNIV,DEPT MANAGEMENT PHILADELPHIA PA 19141
Titolo Testata:
Omega
fascicolo: 5, volume: 24, anno: 1996,
pagine: 523 - 538
SICI:
0305-0483(1996)24:5<523:AGDFFC>2.0.ZU;2-I
Fonte:
ISI
Lingua:
ENG
Soggetto:
ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; ORDINAL RANKING; ISSUES; PREFERENCE; INTENSITY; SELECTION; MODEL; TASK;
Keywords:
GROUP DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; HUMAN RESOURCE SELECTION; MULTICRITERIA DECISION MAKING; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; MAXIMIZE AGREEMENT HEURISTIC; DELPHI;
Tipo documento:
Article
Natura:
Periodico
Settore Disciplinare:
Physical, Chemical & Earth Sciences
CompuMath Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Citazioni:
56
Recensione:
Indirizzi per estratti:
Citazione:
M. Tavana et al., "A GROUP DECISION-SUPPORT FRAMEWORK FOR CONSENSUS RANKING OF TECHNICALMANAGER CANDIDATES", Omega, 24(5), 1996, pp. 523-538

Abstract

In many developed countries, today's socioeconomic environment has expanded the role of the technical manager. Organizations capable of recruiting technical managers with adequate management education and interpersonal skills, in addition to technical expertise, are more likely to be successful in managing their limited resources. A technical manager's success is also dependent on the manager's acceptance by his/hersubordinates, peers, and superiors, and the decision to hire a technical manager should be made with their participation. Many of these individuals have little background or experience in hiring, and they needappropriate decision support. This paper presents a framework to helpa group of decision makers define and articulate a hierarchy of hiring criteria and subcriteria and rate each of the candidates on that hierarchy. To improve consistency among group members, tbe proposed groupdecision support system (GDSS) combines the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with the Delphi principles of anonymous feedback and iteration. Given the decision makers' desire for a consensus choice, the framework deviates from the normal practice of AHP, and uses the Maximize Agreement Heuristic (MAH) to arrive at the final ranking of the candidates. An application to the ranking of nurse manager candidates at a hospital in the United States is presented. Copyright (C) 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd

ASDD Area Sistemi Dipartimentali e Documentali, Università di Bologna, Catalogo delle riviste ed altri periodici
Documento generato il 06/07/20 alle ore 07:43:08