Catalogo Articoli (Spogli Riviste)

OPAC HELP

Titolo:
FACIAL EMG IN AN ANGER-PROVOKING SITUATION - INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN DIRECTING ANGER OUTWARDS OR INWARDS
Autore:
JANCKE L;
Indirizzi:
KFA JULICH GMBH,RES CTR,INST MED,LEO BRANDT STR D-52428 JULICH GERMANY UNIV DUSSELDORF,INST ALLGEMEINE PSYCHOL D-40225 DUSSELDORF GERMANY
Titolo Testata:
International journal of psychophysiology
fascicolo: 3, volume: 23, anno: 1996,
pagine: 207 - 214
SICI:
0167-8760(1996)23:3<207:FEIAAS>2.0.ZU;2-7
Fonte:
ISI
Lingua:
ENG
Soggetto:
BASIC EMOTIONS; AUDIENCE; DEPRESSION; EXPRESSION; TASK;
Keywords:
FACIAL ACTION; EMG; FACIAL EMG; ANGER; EMOTION;
Tipo documento:
Article
Natura:
Periodico
Settore Disciplinare:
Physical, Chemical & Earth Sciences
Physical, Chemical & Earth Sciences
Science Citation Index Expanded
Science Citation Index Expanded
Science Citation Index Expanded
Citazioni:
34
Recensione:
Indirizzi per estratti:
Citazione:
L. Jancke, "FACIAL EMG IN AN ANGER-PROVOKING SITUATION - INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN DIRECTING ANGER OUTWARDS OR INWARDS", International journal of psychophysiology, 23(3), 1996, pp. 207-214

Abstract

This study was designed to examine whether facial EMG reactions occurred while subjects experienced anger. All subjects (n = 60) were required to perform an intelligence test. Randomly chosen subjects (n = 40)received negative feedback irrespective of their actual test achievement. The remaining twenty subjects served as control group and received neutral feedback. While all subjects received their feedback, facialEMG was recorded over the mm. frontalis lateralis, corrugator supercilii, orbicularis oculi, and zygomaticus major. In addition, anger and fear self-reports were measured. Those subjects receiving negative feedback were post-hoc divided into two groups. One group comprised subjects verbally expressing their anger toward the experimenter (anger-outgroup, n = 19) while the other anger group comprised subjects who were angry with themselves (anger-in group, n = 18). Facial EMG reactionsover the m. frontalis and m. corrugator were only evident for the anger-out group while they received negative feedback. In addition, intensity of anger self-reports were unrelated to facial EMG reactions. It is hypothesized that the anger-out group implicitly communicated with the experimenter by generating facial anger displays including mm. frontalis and corrugator EMG activity. Thus, these results were taken as evidence that facial displays are communicative tools used to communicate with an interactant although he/she is not physically present (implicit audience).

ASDD Area Sistemi Dipartimentali e Documentali, Università di Bologna, Catalogo delle riviste ed altri periodici
Documento generato il 02/06/20 alle ore 01:07:04